IFRS 3: The acquisition method at a glance

Most traditional acquisitions, such as the purchase of a controlling interest in an unrelated operating entity, are business combinations within the scope of IFRS 3. However, many transactions or other events involving the purchase of another entity or groups of assets require further analysis to determine whether:

• what was acquired constitutes a business
• control, as defined by IFRS 10, has been obtained
• the combination is within the scope of IFRS 3.

The party identified as the accounting acquirer will most often be the legal owner (the accounting acquirer is usually the entity that transfers the consideration ie cash or other assets). However, IFRS 3 requires an in-substance approach to identify the party that obtained control (ie the acquirer). This approach looks beyond the legal form of the transaction and considers the rights of the combining entities and their former owners.

The acquisition date is the date the acquirer obtains control of the acquiree, usually the specified closing or completion date of the business combination.

This is typically the most complex and time-consuming step which requires the acquirer to:

• recognise identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date, including some intangible assets that may not have been previously recognised in the acquiree’s financial statements
• measure identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value, with a few exceptions
• determine the applicability of some specific recognition and measurement provisions
• classify or designate the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

The acquirer has a choice to measure present ownership-type NCI at either fair value or the proportionate interest in the acquiree’s recognised identifiable net assets. When making the choice, a number of factors should be considered. Decisions made at the time of the business combination cannot be revisited. The measurement of NCI affects the amount of goodwill that can be recognised and it can also impact post-combination reported results.

Consideration transferred can include cash and other assets transferred, liabilities incurred and equity interests issued by the acquirer. Some consideration may be deferred or be contingent on future events. In addition, consideration transferred in exchange for the acquired business may be different from the contractual purchase price if the overall transaction includes elements that are not part of the business combination exchange. For example, the following must be accounted for separately from the business combination:

• acquisition-related costs, including:
• reimbursement of those incurred by the acquiree or the former owners
• those paid directly to third parties
• the effective settlement of a pre-existing relationship between the acquirer and acquiree.

Goodwill or gain from a bargain purchase is measured as a residual amount.

Contingent consideration arrangements

The purchase price may include contingent consideration arrangements, such as variations to the ultimate price depending on the future performance of the acquired business.

Financial reporting effects

• recognition of the contingent consideration on the acquisition date at fair value has an immediate effect on the statement of financial position (ie directly impacts goodwill and reported amounts of liability or equity depending on the nature of the contingent consideration to be transferred)
• subsequent changes in the fair value of any contingent consideration liability will usually affect post-combination earnings of the group. Whereas contingent consideration initially recognised as equity will not impact the post-acquisition performance of the group.

Contingent payment arrangements

It also could include contingent payment arrangements with selling employee-shareholders who remain employees of the acquired business (eg earn-out agreements).

Financial reporting effects

• accounted for based on their substance and may need to be treated (wholly or partly) as compensation for future services and accounted for using the guidance in either IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payment’ or IAS 19 ‘Employee Benefits’ rather than as a payment for the business acquired
• arrangements for which payments are automatically forfeited if employment of the selling shareholders is terminated, should be accounted for as remuneration for post-acquisition services.

Transferring acquirer’s assets

The parties may agree to transfer some of the acquirer’s assets.

Financial reporting effects

• the assets transferred should be remeasured to their fair value on the acquisition date and form part of consideration transferred
• any remeasurement gain or loss is recognised immediately in profit or loss.

The parties may arrange that transaction costs are paid by the vendor which may or may not be reimbursed by the acquirer.

Financial reporting effects

• reimbursement of acquisition costs should be recognised as an immediate expense
• if costs paid by the vendor are not reimbursed directly by the acquirer, a portion of the contractual price should be treated as in-substance reimbursement and excluded from consideration transferred.

The parties may have an existing:

• contractual arrangement (eg supplier and customer relationship or a licensor and licensee relationship)
• non-contractual relationship (eg litigation).

Financial reporting effects

• if the business combination has the effect of settling a pre-existing relationship, that settlement should be accounted for as a separate transaction from the business
  combination
• the amount deemed to relate to the settlement of the pre-existing relationship is excluded from the consideration transferred for the business acquired
• any gain or loss arising from the settlement of such an arrangement should be recognised immediately in profit or loss.

The acquirer may replace the acquiree’s share-based payment awards or alternatively continue the acquiree’s share based payment awards without changes.

Financial reporting effects

Replacement awards:

• need to assess the portion of the consideration transferred that represents the value of the replacement awards attributable to pre-combination service
• amount relating to post-combination service should be recognised as compensation expense over the remaining vesting period.

Existing award schemes not replaced:

• the fair value of any vested awards is recognised as part of NCI with a consequent effect on goodwill
• NCI is increased by the value of unvested awards attributable to pre-combination service
• amount relating to post-combination service is recognised as compensation expense over the vesting period on the basis of the market-based measurement of that award at the acquisition date.

These contracts may be negotiated at or around the same time as the business combination.

Financial reporting effects

• a contract that in substance represents the purchase, at the date of acquisition, of the remaining acquiree shares is accounted for as part of the business combination, as a deferred or contingent consideration arrangement. As the remaining shares held by NCI are considered to have been acquired at the date of acquisition, the acquirer is considered having already acquired 100% of the acquiree shares and as such, no NCI should be recognised
• contracts that are in substance arrangements to purchase NCI shares at a future date after the acquiring entity gains control of the subsidiary (also referred to as put options over NCI) should be accounted for as a separate transaction. It should not be considered part of the business combination.

• understand the accounting effects of the terms set out in the sale and purchase agreement
• identify related transactions or other elements that may require separate accounting
• identify transactions/agreements or other arrangements that have negotiated at or near the same time to assess whether they should form part of the business combination.

Implementation hints

Involve finance/accounting personnel in the early stages of the negotiation to assist in evaluating the accounting effects of the deal terms.

Identifying intangible assets

• these assets are more challenging to identify as they are often not recognised in the acquiree’s financial statements.

Implementation hints

Consider various sources of information that may provide valuable inputs in detecting intangible assets:

• the acquiree’s operations
• results of due diligence
• acquiree’s website and other investorrelated communication.

Identifying contingent liabilities

• the acquirer should recognise at the acquisition date a contingent liability assumed in a business combination if it is a present obligation and
  its fair value can be measured reliably.

Implementation hints

Consider various sources of information that may provide valuable inputs in detecting contingent liabilities:

• legal correspondence
• results of due diligence
• documentation and communication with suppliers.

Valuation process

• fair values of certain items may not be readily available and may require
  complex estimates.

Implementation hints

• implement a robust process in developing fair value estimates
• assistance from valuation experts may be required if the acquirer does not have the relevant expertise and experience in valuation.

Determining consideration transferred

• need to consider the effects of transactions that are not part of the business combination under IFRS 3

Implementation hints

Consider the commercial reasons for each material element of the transaction, who initiated it and its timing.

Making an accounting policy choice

• accounting policy choices can be made in certain areas, for example:
• measurement of NCI
• classification and designation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

Implementation hints

Assess the implications of the choices available, including the immediate effect on the acquisition date; the relative ease of applying a particular choice; the subsequent accounting requirements; and the related impact on post-combination earnings.

• some entities enter into frequent business combination transactions but for others, these are one-time events. The entity may then not have the adequate resources to apply IFRS 3’s requirements.

Implementation hints

• assess the skills and relevant experience of the finance team to determine whether external consultants are required to assist with the purchase price allocation process that is set out in IFRS 3
• this decision should be made early in the process to ensure the quality of financial information and avoid unnecessary delays.

• the accounting for a business combination, including all the required disclosures, should be completed within the measurement period (which should not exceed 12 months after the acquisition date). Depending on the complexity of the business combination, this time frame may be challenging.

Implementation hints

• plan early
• identify all the relevant requirements, gather required information and assess the needed resources
• engage external consultants as necessary and agree on scope of work, due dates and deliverables
• implement a project plan and monitor progress of activities regularly
• engage your auditor early!